Dangerous Substance Establishments and Other Incompatible Land Uses
12.14 Modern commercial development can involve the storage, use or manufacture of substances which are potentially hazardous by reason of fire, explosion or gaseous emission etc, not only to people working in the premises, but also to those present in the area around the site. Other land uses, whilst not potentially hazardous, can cause a loss of amenity, for instance by reason of smell. The proper planning of an area requires, in appropriate cases, separation or other mitigation measures to enable development to take place, whilst in some cases, development should not be supported.
Dangerous Substance Establishments
12.15 In the case of dangerous substance establishments, certain sites and pipelines are designated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) as 'Dangerous Substance Establishments' by virtue of the quantities of hazardous substances present. The siting of such establishments is subject to planning controls, for example, under the Planning (Control of Major Accident Hazards) Regulations (1999), with the objective, in the longer term, to maintain appropriate distances between establishments, residential areas and other areas of public use and areas of particular natural sensitivity or interest. In accordance with DETR Circular 04/2000, the Council will consult the HSE, as appropriate, about the siting of any proposed dangerous substance establishment (including pipelines).
12.16 Calderdale has a number of dangerous substance establishments, including pipelines. Whilst they are subject to stringent controls under existing health and safety legislation, it is considered prudent to control the kinds of development permitted in the vicinity of these installations. For this reason, the Council has been advised by the HSE of consultation distances for each of these installations. In determining whether or not to grant planning permission for a proposed development within these consultation zones, the Council will consult the HSE about risks to the proposed development from the dangerous substance establishment in accordance with DETR Circular 04/2000. The dangerous substance establishments, (including the pipelines, currently all Transco pipelines moving gas) are listed in Policy EP6. They are also shown on the UDP Proposals Map. In addition, in cases where a dangerous substance establishment is located outside Calderdale’s boundaries, but whose consultation zone occupies part of the local authority area, then the necessary consultations with the HSE will take place. The numbers and distribution of these establishments may change. The HSE will inform the Council about such changes, and any new establishments will be subject to the same policy as the existing ones. The following Policies will therefore apply:-
Policy EP 6
Dangerous Substance Establishments
The following dangerous substance establishments are shown on the Proposals Map:-
i. Buildings:-
- Surfachem Limited, The Ainleys, Huddersfield Road, Elland
- British Gas PLC, Mulcture Hall Road, Halifax
- McIntyre UK LTD. Holywell Green, near Halifax
- Calor Gas Limited, Dewsbury Road, Elland
- Cat Lane/Luddendenfoot (Transco Index No. 1924)
- Hebden Bridge/Mulcture Hall Road. (Transco Index No. 1925)
- Ripponden Inlet Feed (Transco Index No. 1926)
- Mulcture Hall/Whitehall Road (Transco Index No. 1931)
- Hartshead Moor/Dewsbury (Transco Index No. 1940)
- Canal Road/Hartshead Moor (Transco Index No. 1942)
- East Bierley/Hopton Top (Transco Index No. 1933).
The Health and Safety Executive will inform the Council of any changes to this list, and new establishments will be subject to the same planning policy.
The Council will consult the Health and Safety Executive on appropriate development proposals within the consultation zones. Where development proposals within the consultation zones could, in the view of the Health and Safety Executive, result in an unacceptable risk to public health and safety or have a harmful effect on areas of particular natural sensitivity or interest (including areas of ecological value), then they will not be permitted by the Council. Where development is judged to be acceptable, conditions and/or planning obligations may be attached to maintain an appropriate buffer between the conflicting land-uses or to control the possible impact of the development.
Policy EP 7
New or Extended Dangerous Substance Establishments
The Council will consult the Health and Safety Executive on development proposals for new, or extensions to existing dangerous substance establishments and will oppose development or apply appropriate conditions and/or planning obligations, where, on the advice of the Health and Safety Executive, there is considered to be an unacceptable risk to public health and safety.
12.17 Certain types of hazardous development require applicants to carry out an Environmental Assessment (EA) in every case. In other cases, the requirement to carry out an EA will depend on whether the development is likely to have a significant impact on the environment or a risk to public health and safety. Applicants are advised to consult the Council at an early stage to obtain a screening opinion to ascertain the necessity for such an assessment.
Other Incompatible Land Uses
12.18 The juxtaposition of certain non-hazardous land-uses can nevertheless lead to a loss of amenity, by reason of smell, noise or flies. These incompatible uses should, where appropriate, be kept apart. For example, housing or a school should be kept at an appropriate distance from a wastewater treatment plant. In cases such as these, the following Policy will apply:-
Policy EP 8
Other Incompatible Uses
Where development proposals could lead to the juxtaposition of incompatible land-uses, they will be only permitted if they do not lead to an unacceptable loss of amenity caused by odour, noise or other problems. Where development is permitted, appropriate planning conditions and/or obligations will be added as necessary to provide landscaping, screening, bunding, physical separation distances or other mitigation measures.
