Mixed Use Allocations

4.24 A rationale behind the previous UDP (1997) was that, where appropriate, it sought to separate incompatible land uses such as employment and housing. Whilst this approach is still relevant, where certain conflicting land uses are concerned, given current development pressures on land there exists an increasing desire to seek to make the most effective and sustainable use of land. As a response to this objective the Government advocates the concept of mixed-use development, which is principally outlined in PPG4 ‘Industrial, Commercial Development and Small Firms' paragraphs 14 to 19. The notion of mixed-use development is not new, and basically involves the development of more than one use on a site or within a building and often seeks to establish a higher density development in a manner that produces an effective and sustainable development. Mixed-use development can help create vitality and diversity, increase access to work for local people, reduce the need to travel, make efficient use of brownfield land and can be more sustainable than development consisting of a single use. A mixed-use development allows for flexibility and could incorporate a range of uses such as residential, employment, retail, leisure and other community facilities. However, given the relatively small size of most suitable sites in Calderdale, it is unlikely that all these uses could be combined on a single development site.

4.25 Mixed-use development is not appropriate for every site. For example, on a large-scale employment site that represents a scarce resource, the introduction of residential development could diminish the full employment potential of the site. However, mixed-use development can help to kick-start the development of difficult sites, for example by including a cost effective use such as residential in order to help to overcome prohibitive site preparation costs. As such, where it is appropriate, the mixed-use concept will be considered as a development option throughout the District.

4.26 There can sometimes be an imbalance between the number of available jobs and people in certain locations. An aspiration is to try to redress any such imbalances by helping to support and strengthen the range of employment opportunities present in local areas. However, the occurrence of incompatible uses can cause problems for the occupiers both of new and existing developments. Any mixed-use development site or proposal will need to fit in with, and be complementary to, their surroundings. An important consideration in any mixed-use scheme is that the character of existing residential areas should not be undermined by inappropriate new uses.

4.27 The most significant and appropriate form that mixed-use should take in Calderdale is the mix of housing and employment. However, not every form of employment will be suitable. The Use Classes Order dictates that any B1 use must be capable of being undertaken in any residential area without detriment to the amenity of that area. It is this specific form of employment (which encompasses uses such as offices, high tech industry, research and development, studios, and light industry) which together with housing will be supported in mixed-use areas as shown on the Proposals Map. Other forms of employment uses and ancillary facilities may also be supported, such as within the A1, A2 and D2 Use Classes and social and cultural facilities, but employment uses within Use Classes B2 or B8 will not generally be supported as they are not considered to be compatible with residential areas.

4.28 In order to allow flexibility to develop attractive, imaginative and viable schemes, the area and amount of land appropriate to each particular land use on a mixed-use site is not specified. However, the Council’s objective is to achieve mixed-use development on these sites and, with the exception of the former Transco Site (MU2) which may be developed solely or predominantly for residential purposes, it is not envisaged that schemes for a single land use, or schemes that include disproportionately high amounts of a particular land use, will be viewed as acceptable. Conditions on planning permissions or planning obligations will be used to secure an appropriate mixture of uses and to ensure that all elements of a scheme are implemented as proposed. Developments could involve the use of buildings or land whose current or last use was for employment purposes for non-employment uses. Within the identified mixed-use sites, securing development that provides a satisfactory mixture of uses on the site as a whole, will outweigh Policy E 5 ‘Safeguarding Employment Land and Buildings’ considerations. Policy E 4 ‘Sites Allocated for Mixed-Use’ does allow for the extension of existing premises or proposals that support existing uses within the site. Policy E 4 ‘Sites Allocated for Mixed-Use’ lists larger sites that are allocated as mixed-use sites. Consideration will also be given to proposed mixed-use development outside these areas where the use would not undermine other UDP Policy objectives. The mixed-use sites together with any restrictions on their development are set out below:-

Policy E 4

Sites Allocated for Mixed-Use

The sites in the table below are allocated to provide land for mixed-use development and are shown on the Proposals Map.

E4A: Within these areas development proposals which include a mix of residential and appropriate employment uses as outlined in the table will be permitted provided that the proposed development:-
  1. relates well in scale and character to the locality;
  2. does not create any unacceptable environmental, amenity, safety, highway, or other problems;
  3. is not for piecemeal development that would prejudice the comprehensive development of the site; and
  4. is consistent with other relevant UDP policies.

E4B: Within mixed-use sites, applications for a single use, or that comprise a disproportionately high amount of a particular use, will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances. Such applications will need to be justified either in terms of their non-suitability for mixed-use development or in terms of their contribution to the overall mixture of uses within the locality.

E4C: There are significant physical constraints on the development of the former Transco Site (Site MU2), which are regarded as the circumstances justifying an exception to the general restrictions on uses within mixed-use sites. In view of these constraints a residential development or mixed-use development with predominantly residential uses together with limited or ancillary other uses would be acceptable subject to the criteria set out in E4A.

E4D: Ancillary community facilities and other forms of land use (including extensions to existing buildings and proposals which support existing uses) will also be acceptable providing that they are compatible with residential development and comply with the above criteria.

Site Ref Location

Size (Hectares)

Status

Appropriate Use Classes
MU1 West of Boothtown Road, Boothtown, Halifax

15.35

PDL/GF

A2, B1*, C1, C2, C3, D1 and ancillary small scale A1 and A3
MU2 § Former Transco site, Mulcture Hall Road, Halifax

3.76

PDL

A1*, A2, B1*, C1, C2, C3, D1 (See also clause E4C)
MU3 Former Horses at Work site, South Parade, Halifax

2.92

PDL

A1*, A2, B1*, C1, C2, C3, D1
MU4 § Sugdens Mill, Mill Royd Street, Brighouse

3.28

PDL

A1*, A2, A3, B1*, C1, C2, C3, D1, D2*
MU5 Dewsbury Road, Elland

4.71

PDL

A1*, A2, A3, B1*, C1, C2, C3, D1, D2*
MU6 Broad Street, Halifax

1.96

PDL

A1, A2, A3, B1*, C1, C2, C3, D1, D2
MU8 Drakes Industrial Estate, Shay Lane, Halifax (formerly EM28)

3.65

PDL/GF

A2, B1*, B2, B8, C1, C2, C3, D1 and ancillary small scale A1 and A3
MU9 Parade of Shops, Mixenden Road, Mixenden

0.40

PDL

A1, A2, A3, B1, C1, C2, C3, D1, D2
MU10 Furness Avenue, Illingworth, Halifax

3.47

PDL

A2, B1*, C1, C2, C3 D1 together with a significant proportion of Open Space

PDL = Previously Developed Land        GF = Greenfield

Footnotes:-

* Uses subject to an assessment against the sequential approach for retail, key town centre, leisure and office developments, and an assessment of the need for retail developments (POLICY GS 2 ‘THE LOCATION OF RETAIL AND KEY TOWN CENTRE AND LEISURE USES’, Policy S 1 ‘Sequential Approach for Retail and other Key Town Centre or Leisure Uses’, Policy S 2 ‘Criteria for Assessing Retail Developments’ and Policy E 8 ‘Criteria for Assessing Major Office B1 Development’ are of particular relevance).

§ = A flood risk assessment is required to be undertaken on these sites. It is the responsibility of the developer or applicant to undertake the flood risk assessment.

Back to Top