5 Monitoring Indicators
Introduction
5.1 The Council is required to monitor a suite of Core Output Indicators laid down by the Government. These are set out in the guidance issued by the ODPM 'Local Development Framework Monitoring: A good practice guide' (2005), and its update 'Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) - FAQs and Seminar Feedback on Emerging Best Practice 2004/05' (ODPM September 2005). Information on each of the topics set by guidance is required and the indicators are to be collected on a consistent time frame across the country using a clearly identified set of definitions to allow meaningful analysis. The Council's response to these indicators is set out in the section 'Core Output Indicators'. Where it has not been possible to provide information, reasons are given and monitoring will be put in place to ensure that information is available for future AMRs.
5.2 A number of indicators are not monitored to any extent by the Council, but it is clear that the Government requires this information to be provided in the future. Putting this monitoring framework into place will cause additional delays in document production for the LDF, but it is accepted that this work is essential if the Council is to demonstrate that sustainable development is being rolled out across the District.
Contextual Indicators
5.3 It is considered necessary to set up contextual indicators for the District, beyond those required by the Government. These will allow a profile of the District to be established which will be used as a basis for assessing in more detail the delivery of sustainable development within the District. As a result it is likely that in future AMRs the section on contextual indicators will be expanded to demonstrate in more detail the sustainability implications of the Replacement Calderdale UDP (2006) and then documents within the Local Development Framework.
|
CONTEXTUAL INDICATORS FOR CALDERDALE |
||||
| POPULATION | ||||
| Population | 2003 - 193,200 | 2006 - 198,500 | 2010 - 201,500 | 2015 - 207,200 |
| Source: 2003 & 2006 = ONS mid year estimates; 2010 & 2015 = ONS 2004-based projections | ||||
| POPULATION STRUCTURE | ||||
|
Age Group |
2006 mid-year estimate |
2011 projection (2004-based) |
||
|
ALL |
198,500 |
202,600 |
||
|
0-4 |
12,100 |
12,100 |
||
|
5-14 |
25,100 |
24,500 |
||
|
15-24 |
24,300 |
24,400 |
||
|
25-44 |
55,300 |
53,700 |
||
|
45-64 |
51,300 |
55,200 |
||
|
65-74 |
15,500 |
17,600 |
||
|
75+ |
14,900 |
15,200 |
||
| HOUSEHOLDS | ||||
| Number of Households | 2006 - 84,500 | 2011 - 88,900 | 2016 - 93,700 | 2015 - 98,300 |
| Source: ONS 2004-Based Household Projections | ||||
| Household Size (From Census - 1991 and 2001 and 2004-based projections) |
1991
|
2001
|
2006
|
|
| % Households per household size (Census 1991 & 2001) |
1991
|
2001
|
||
| HOUSE PRICES | ||||
| Average ALL Dwellings (£) | April 2004 82,288 |
April 2005 96,452 |
April 2006 104,922 |
April 2007 114,920 |
| (See Section 2 and Table 2.8 of this AMR for breakdown by House Type) | ||||
| HOUSING STOCK and VACANT DWELLINGS | ||||
| Housing Stock | 90,399 | Source: Housing Flows Reconciliation Return | ||
| Population Density per hectare | 5.5 | Source - 2006 | ||
| Percentage of vacant dwellings | 4.4% | Source - 2001 Census | ||
| HOUSING TENURE AND STOCK TYPES | ||||
|
|
Source -2001 Census | ||
| EMPLOYMENT & THE ECONOMY | ||||
| Employed Residents by Employment Type |
Manufacturing |
17.5% |
Source Annual Population Survey, 2006 | |
| Construction | 7% | |||
| Distribution, Hotels and Restaurants | 15.7% | |||
| Transport and Communications | 5.8% | |||
| Banking, finance, insurance etc. | 15.8% | |||
| Public administration, Education & Health | 30.7% | |||
| Other incl. other services, energy & agriculture | 6.9% | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7% Source: Benefits Agency (Jul 07) | |||
| Percentage of Resident Workforce Commuting to Employment outside the District | TOTAL : -34.4% |
Destinations -
Bradford - 10% Kirklees - 9.9% Leeds - 5.2% Wakefield - 1.7% North Yorks - 0.4% South Yorks - 0.3% Other - 6.8% |
Source: West Yorkshire Household Survey 2002 (Calderdale in Depth 2004) | |
| Commuting by Mode | 1991 | 2001 |
Source Census 1991 and 2001
|
|
| By CAR | 62.8% | 65.9% | ||
| By Public Transport |
Train -1.5%
Bus - 16.2% |
Train - 2.1%
Bus - 11.3% |
||
| By Foot | 12.7% | 10.8% | ||
| By Cycle | 0.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Percentage of Workforce working at Home | 3.7% | 8.7% | ||
| RETAILING AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES | ||||
|
1998 |
2005 |
|||
| TOTAL Floorspace of Retailing in Calderdale | 282,031 sq.m | 474,658.29 sq m | ||
| TOTAL Convenience Retailing sq.m (gross) | 34,601 sq.m | 74,924.81 sq m | ||
| TOTAL Comparison Retailing (sq.m (gross) | 83,386 sq.m | 399,733.48 sq m | ||
| TOTAL FLOOR SPACE IN DEFINED TOWN CENTRES | ||||
| HALIFAX | 51,122 sq.m |
96,371 (Revised Survey Area)
59,053 (Using Old Survey Area) |
||
| BRIGHOUSE | 14,395 sq.m | 19,727 sq.m | ||
| SOWERBY BRIDGE | 4,519 sq.m | 5,592 sq.m | ||
| ELLAND | 5,953 sq.m | 5,622 sq.m | ||
| HEBDEN BRIDGE | 7,218 sq.m | 6,683 sq.m | ||
| TODMORDEN | 7,546 sq.m | 8,127 sq m | ||
| Retail Floor space in Edge of Centre or Out of Centre Locations | 65,541 sq.m | 41,326 sq m | ||
Core Output Indicators (Required by Regulations)
-
The following table sets out the Council's response for the year 2006/2007 to the Core Indicators required to be monitored by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG - formerly the ODPM). Not all the Indicators can adequately be assessed, given the monitoring framework that exists in Calderdale. However, where difficulties are known to exist these are explained within the text and efforts will be made to ensure that relevant entries can be achieved in future Annual Monitoring Reports.
OUTCOMES for the Year 2006/2007
|
|||
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT |
|||
| Core CI -1A | Amount of Land Developed for Employment by type (Use Classes Order) | ||
|
Gross square metres (excluding external walls) |
B1A | 5,743 | |
|
B1B |
0 | ||
|
B1C |
0 | ||
|
B2 |
9,698 | ||
|
B8 |
12,181 | ||
|
TOTAL |
27,622 sq m | ||
| Source: Employment Land Monitoring Figures | |||
| Core CI- 1B | Amount of land developed for employment by type, which is in "development" and/or "regeneration areas" defined in the Local Development Framework | ||
| Gross square metres (excluding external walls) | B1A | 0 | |
| B1B | 0 | ||
|
B1C |
0 | ||
|
B2 |
0 | ||
|
B8 |
0 | ||
|
TOTAL |
0 sq m | ||
| Source: Employment Land Monitoring Figures | |||
| Core CI - 1C | Percentage of 1A by type (Use Classes Order) which is on previously developed land | ||
| Gross square metres (excluding external walls) |
B1A |
100% |
|
|
B1B |
N/A |
||
|
B1C |
N/A |
||
|
B2 |
100% |
||
|
B8 |
100% |
||
|
TOTAL |
100% |
||
| Source: Employment Land Monitoring Figures | |||
| Core CI -1D | Employment land supply by type | ||
|
Note: (i) As yet there are no sites defined and allocated in the local development framework. Figures represent (ii) sites for which planning permission has been granted for (UCOs) B1 (a), (b) and (c), B2 and B8. *A further 100.58 ha of allocated employment land and 35.49 ha of mixed use land remains available for future development as part of the adopted Unitary Development Plan. |
B1A | 18.17 | |
| B1B | 0.00 | ||
|
B1C |
0.00 |
||
|
B2 |
57.23 |
||
|
B8 |
12.62 |
||
|
TOTAL |
88.11 ha |
||
| Source: Employment Land Monitoring Figures | |||
| Core CI 1Ei | Losses of employment land in development / regeneration areas | ||
| Note: Not possible to present as no figures were provided in the previous monitoring year (1D) to record against. This information has been recorded from April 2006 will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008 against the figures provided in (CI-1D). | |||
| Core CI- 1Eii | Losses of employment land in Calderdale | ||
| Note: Not possible to present as no figures were provided in the previous monitoring year (1D) to record against. This information has been recorded from April 2006 will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008 against the figures provided in (CI-1D). | |||
| Core CI 1F | Amount of employment land lost to residential development | ||
| Note: Not possible to present as no figures were provided in the previous monitoring year (1D) to record against. This information has been recorded from April 2006 will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008 against the figures provided in (CI-1D). | |||
HOUSING |
|||
| Core CI - 2A | HOUSING TRAJECTORY - The trajectory is included in Section 2 of this AMR with summary figures shown here | ||
| Core CI - 2Ai | Net additional dwellings over the previous 5 year period, or since the start of the relevant development plan document period, whichever is the longer |
7064 |
Figures are gross and reflect the RSS period (RSS housing requirement is gross). Data on losses not sufficiently reliable to provide net figure. |
| Core CI - 2Aii | Net additional dwellings for the current year (2006/07) |
1318 |
Figure is gross. No reliable data on losses. |
| Core CI - 2Aiii | Projected net additional dwellings up to the end of the relevant development plan period or over a 10 year period from its adoption, whichever is the longer |
5460/6360 |
Figures are to the end of the RSS period (2016) and based on either an annual rate of 450 as per RSS or a higher rate of 600 (see section 2 of this AMR for further explanation). |
| Core CI - 2Aiv | Annual net additional dwelling requirement |
450 |
RSS housing requirement figure (gross) |
| Core CI - 2Av | Annual average number of net additional dwellings needed to meet overall housing requirements, having regard to previous years' performances |
See Housing Trajectory and Table 2.6 in Section 2 of this AMR |
|
| Core CI - 2B | Percentage of new and converted dwellings on previously developed land |
91.4% |
|
| Core CI - 2Ci | Percentage of new dwellings completed at less than 30 dwellings per hectare |
18.4% |
Includes New Build & Conversions
|
| Core CI - 2Cii | Percentage of new dwellings completed at between 30 and 50 dwellings per hectare |
25.4% |
|
| Core CI - 2Ciii | Percentage of new dwellings completed at above 50 dwellings per hectare |
56.1% |
|
| Core CI - 2D | Affordable Housing completions |
140 |
|
TRANSPORT |
|||
| Core CI - 3A | Amount of completed non-residential development complying with car-parking standards set out in the Local Development Framework |
Use Classes Order |
|
| Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
|
Not possible to say |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note Core CI - 3A - Car Parking Standards : - The Local Development Framework has yet to be established. For the year in question (2005/06) the 'Saved Plan' was the Calderdale
UDP dating from 1997. This contained Minimum Parking Requirements, and so was not in line with the Maximum Allowances guidance
introduced by PPG13. As a result it is not meaningful to provide details against this Indicator.
Detailed monitoring of Car Parking provision against these Minimum Requirements has not been undertaken as a matter of course. However it will be necessary to monitor provision in order to meet requirements for the AMR against the Maximum Parking Allowances laid down within the Replacement Calderdale UDP (2006). This monitoring will be developed as part of the AMR report for future years. |
|||
| Core CI - 3B | Percentage of new residential development within 30 minutes public transport time of : - |
|
|
|
See note below. This information will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008. |
||
|
See note below. This information will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008. |
||
|
See note below. This information will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008. |
||
|
See note below. This information will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008. |
||
|
See note below. This information will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008. |
||
|
See note below. This information will be made available for presentation for the monitoring year 2007/2008. |
||
|
Note: The Accession Model, which was purchased by the Council during 2006/07 has experienced technical difficulties during set up. Along with 70% of Local Authorities this Council is utilising Corporate GIS concepts. The Council holds Ordnance Survey data once and does not have a separate holding for every 3rd party application. The Accession Model has difficulties integrating with this approach which have yet to be overcome. The Council is in liaison with with Accession support, but have not yet found a resolution. This is an active project, but it has not been possible to present the results required for the current AMR year. |
|||
LOCAL SERVICES |
|||
| Core CI - 4Ai |
Amount of completed Retail Development
|
Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
3525.4 sq m |
| Core CI - 4Aii |
Amount of completed Office Development
|
Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
5743.0 sq m |
| Core CI - 4Aiii |
Amount of completed Leisure Development
|
Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
0.0 sq m |
| Core CI - 4Bi |
Amount and Percentage of Completed Retail Development in Town Centres
|
Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
143.4 sq m = 4.06% |
| Core CI - 4Bii |
Amount and Percentage of Completed Office Development in Town Centres
|
Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
125 sq m = 2.18% |
| Core CI - 4Biii |
Amount and Percentage of completed Leisure Development within Town Centres
|
Gross internal floorspace sq.m |
0 sq m = 0% |
| Core CI - 4C | Amount and Percentage of eligible open spaces managed to Green Flag Award Standard |
(hectares) |
88.33 ha = 0.682% Source: Recreation, Sport & Streetscene |
MINERALS |
|||
| Core CI - 5A |
Production of primary land won minerals
(metric tonnes) |
15835 tonnes (estimate) |
|
| Core CI - 5B |
Production of secondary / recycled aggregates
(metric tonnes) |
41460 tonnes (estimate) |
|
WASTE |
|||
| Core CI - 6A |
Capacity of new waste management facilities by type
(Either cubic metres or metric tonnes... (capacity at landfill sites = cubic m; waste to energy use tonnes.) New facilities to be defined (i) have planning permission and (ii) are operational) |
|
|
| Core CI - 6B |
Amount of municipal waste arising, and managed by management type;
(Types are recycling, landfill etc.- either cubic metres or metric tonnes) |
|
|
| CI - 6C |
Percentage each management type represents of the waste managed (Types are recycling; landfill etc. - either in cubic metres or metric tonnes) |
|
|
FLOOD PROTECTION AND WATER QUALITY |
|||
| Core CI - 7i | Number of planning permissions granted contrary to the advice of the Environment Agency as inappropriate development in the floodplain |
Nil |
Source: Development Control/ Environment Agency |
| Core CI - 7ii | Number of planning permissions granted contrary to the advice of the Environment agency as the development adversely affects water quality |
Nil |
Source: Development Control/ Environment Agency |
BIODIVERSITY |
|||
| Core CI - 8i | Change in priority habitats and species (by type) |
Not currently recorded |
|
| Core CI - 8ii | Change in areas designated for their intrinsic environmental value including sites of international, national, regional or sub-regional significance |
One Local Nature Reserve Sites declared (45.4ha). |
Source: Calderdale MBC Countryside Unit |
RENEWABLE ENERGY |
|||
| Core CI - 9 |
Renewable Energy capacity installed by type
(Types include bio-fuels, wind, solar energy; geothermal. Fig to be in Megawatts). (Installed means completed and available for operation). |
No new installations known about for current monitoring year. Minor domestic installations may have taken place which are not possible to monitor. |
Planning permissions monitored but information on actual installation not known. Means of monitoring renewable energy installations to be reviewed, particularly given proposed amendments to the General Permitted Development Order. |
